Nota informativa sobre la sesión del 18 de mayo de 1982 de la vista oral Causa 2/81 Intelligence note on the 18 May 1982 session of the Causa 2/81 oral hearing

G/7906/1s-os-s2 NO'J.'A INFORMATIVA ASUNTO: VISTA ORAL 2/81 DEL CONSEJO SUPREMO DE JUSTICIA MILITAR. l. DESARROLLO DE LA SEST0N CORRESPONDIENTE AL DIA 18-05-82 Han intervenido en la sesión de hoy: () - El Teniente D. Antonio Hernández Grifi6, defensor del Te niente de la Guardia Civil Vecinos NGfiez - D. Manuel Novalvos y Pérez de Acevedo, defensor del Te - niente de la Guardia Civil Boza Carranca. 2. INCTDENCIAS Y ESTIMACIONES SOBRE EL DESARROLO DE LA SESION 2.1. Intervención del T~ni ent e Grifi6, defensor del Teniente de la Guardia Civil Vecinos NGfiez. (El Teniente Vecinos estaba destinado en el Subsector de r:::':rá fico. Al mando del Capit§n Abad ocupa,el 23 F,el Congreso.- El Fiscal solicita la pena de 3 afias y un día de prisidn - militar y separación del Servicio. La defensa pide la absolu ci6n. El defensor ha empleado en su alegato 11 minutos) . La defensa presenta un planteamiento similár a l a del Te - ) n.iente Alvarez. Con continuas referencia~ al alegato realizado ayer, el de f ensor determina que la conducta de su patrocinado, en auto~, es de todo punto irreprochable y no delictiva. Se limitó a - una total obediencia de las órdenes de su mando natural. No/ tuvo conocimiento ni voluntad de l o que se pretendía hacer,~ como tampoco &nimo doloso. Por todo,pide .la libertad defini tiva del procesado y se tenga en cuenta el tiempo de prisión preventiva. 2.2. Intervención del Sr. Novalvos, defensor del Teniente de la - Guardia Civil Boza Carranca. (El Tenient e Boza estaba destinado en el Subscctor de Tr~fi co. Acompafia al Capit&n Abad en la ocupación del Congreso. ~ Según el Fiscal participa en el :i.ncidente del General Guti.é r rez Mellado cuando 6ste se l evantó de su cscafio. El Fiscal solicita la pena de 3 afios y un día de prisión/ mi litar y separación del servicio. La def e11sa pide su absolu ci.6n . El defen minutos en la lectura de su escr Comienza el Sr. Novalvos con la lectura de _los articulas - 80 y 186 de las Ordenanzas y a tenor de ellos deducir que el/ comportamiento de su defendido nunca se salj_Ó de las citadas/ Ordenanzas. Explica que sus argumentaciones son simplemente jurídicas y con el siguiente orden metodológico: an§lisis del servicio prestado en el Congreso, eximentes y atenuantes a tener en cuenta por el Tribunal si fuera necesario, y las conclusiones. Después pasa a examinar la acusación del Fiscal y lo proba do en autos. Se detiene especialmente en intentar demostrar que el Teniente Boza no participó en el incidente con el" anci~ no 11 Teniente General Gutiérrez Mellado que se· levanta del escaño/ y es interceptado por un grupo de Guardias Civiles alguno con estrella de oficial. Finaliza el defensor dejando constancia de que el Teniente/ se limita a cumplir una orden de su mando natural, conocida y querida por el Rey. En consonancia con sus conclusiones pide/ o la libre absolución de su patrocinado, asi como sea reintegra do a su destino, l e abonen las retribuciones atrasadas y le~ indemnicen de los gastos y daños causado por el ·error judi- - cial. Por si hubiera lugar a ello solicita que el Tribunal tenga en cuenta la eximente de obediencia debida, y la que se deriva del "pacto del capó". También enumera las atenuantes - que en su caso son de aplicación. 3.- OTROS HECHOS Y COMENTARIOS La sesión, a pesar de los preli minares expectantes, ha teni do poca asistencia de periodistas y familiares (el 20% de es - tos últimos). La reanudación de la vista que est§ prevista para el próximo lunes día 24 empezar§,al parecer, segGn el proyecto en el mo - mento actual, con una breve intervención del Fiscal para p·asar seguidamente a formular la Gltima pregunta a cada uno de los - u piocesados. Se supone que todo ello no se prolongar& mas all&/ del día 25, en base a que los procesados que decidan contestar deben hacerlo sin posibilidad de utilizar documentos escritos/ lo-que acortar& sus i ntervenciones. Entre los periodistas más destacado~ es tema de comentario - el juicio que comenzará en Almeria el 14 de junio. Varios en - tre ellos han mani festado su intención de asistir al mismo.-La previsión de mayor virulencia en cuanto al tratamiento que piensan dar al t erna se centra en el diario "El País". Minutos antes de iniciarse J.a sesión de la mañana cuando el/ letrado Sr . Nieto Funcia abandonaba la Sala del Consejo fue abordado en el patio por algunos p~riodistas con los que cam - bi6 bnpresiones en torno al incidente relativo a su sustitu= ~ ci6n. En ese momento se le acercó la esposa de un Teniente·-co-· ronel que agi tó en su presencia un ejempl ar de D-16 .increspfin dole por su actj_tud. El Sr . Nieto tomó en sus manos el peri6di = co aludido y mfis t arde la duefia del mismo, esposa de un Capi tan pr ocesado lo recuperó mencionando que sól o faltaría que además se llevase su periódico.

G/7906/1s-os-s2 NO'J.'A INFORMATIVE SUBJECT: ORAL HEARING 2/81 OF THE SUPREME COUNCIL OF MILITARY JUSTICE. l. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SESSION CORRESPONDING TO THE DAY 05-18-82 The following participated in today's session: () - Lieutenant D. Antonio Hernández Grifi6, defender of the Te member of the Civil Guard Neighbors NGfiez - Mr. Manuel Novalvos y Pérez de Acevedo, defender of Te - lieutenant of the Boza Carranca Civil Guard. 2. INCIDENTS AND ESTIMATES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SESSION 2.1. Intervention of the T~ni ent e Grifi6, defender of the Lieutenant of the Civil Guard Neighbors NGfiez. (Lieutenant Vecinos was stationed in the r:::':rá Subsector fico. Under the command of Captain Abad, Congress occupies 23 F.- The Prosecutor requests a sentence of 3 years and one day in prison - military and separation from service. The defense asks for acquittal ci6n. The defender has spent 11 minutes in his argument). The defense presents an approach similar to that of Te - ) n.iente Alvarez. With continuous reference to the allegation made yesterday, that of defender determines that the conduct of his sponsored, in auto~, It is completely irreproachable and non-criminal. It was limited to - a total obedience to the orders of his natural command. No/ had knowledge or will of what was intended to be done, ~ nor willful temper. For everything, ask for definite freedom tiva of the accused and the prison time is taken into account preventive. 2.2. Intervention by Mr. Novalvos, defender of the Lieutenant of the - Boza Carranca Civil Guard. (Lieutenant Boza was assigned to the Traffic Subsector co. Accompanies Captain Abad in the occupation of Congress. ~ According to the Prosecutor, he participated in the incident involving General Guti.é Mellado said when he stood up from his helmet. The Prosecutor requests a sentence of 3 years and one day in prison. mi litar and separation from service. The defense asks for his acquittal ci.6n . The defender minutes in reading of his writing Mr. Novalvos begins with the reading of _the articles - 80 and 186 of the Ordinances and according to them, deduce that the/ behavior of his client never deviated from the aforementioned Ordinances. He explains that his arguments are simply legal and with the following methodological order: service analysis provided in Congress, defenses and mitigating circumstances to be taken into account account by the Court if necessary, and the conclusions. Then he goes on to examine the Prosecutor's accusation and prove it do in cars. He stops especially in trying to demonstrate that Lieutenant Boza did not participate in the incident with the "ancient" no 11 Lieutenant General Gutiérrez Mellado who rises from his seat/ and is intercepted by a group of Civil Guards with some officer star The defender concludes, stating that the Lieutenant/ is limited to carrying out an order from his natural command, known and loved by the King. In line with its conclusions it requests/ or the free acquittal of his sponsored person, as well as reintegration sent to his destination, pay him the arrears and compensate for expenses and damages caused by the legal error - cial. In case this were the case, he requests that the Court take into account the defense of due obedience, and that derives from the "hood pact." It also lists the mitigating factors - which are applicable in your case. 3.- OTHER FACTS AND COMMENTS The session, despite the expectant preliminaries, has had little attendance of journalists and family members (20% of es - last cough). The resumption of the hearing that is scheduled for next Monday the 24th will begin§, apparently, according to the project at the moment - ment, with a brief intervention by the Prosecutor to pass then to ask the last question to each of the - u pyocessized. It is assumed that all of this will not continue& further&/ on the 25th, based on the fact that the defendants who decide to answer they must do so without the possibility of using written documents/ which will shorten your interventions. Among the most prominent journalists~ it is the subject of comment - the trial that will begin in Almeria on June 14. Various in - Three of them have expressed their intention to attend it.-The forecast of greater virulence in terms of the treatment that They plan to give the news to the newspaper "El País". Minutes before starting the morning session when the lawyer Mr. Nieto Funcia leaving the Council Chamber was approached in the patio by some journalists with whom he chatted - bi6 bnpressures surrounding the incident regarding his replacement= ~ ci6n. At that moment the wife of a Lieutenant approached him. ronel who waved in his presence a copy of D-16 .increspfin It hurts for his attitude. Mr. Nieto took the newspaper in his hands = referred to and later the owner of the same, wife of a Capi so processed, he recovered it, mentioning that the only thing left to do was He also took his newspaper.